It used to be the case that people all around the world tuned in to the BBC in order to get the news that other broadcasters censored out. Generally, the standard of BBC reporters is very high. Which makes it all the more remarkable that one of them – Richard Black, the Environment Editor – has attracted such a huge amount of criticism for his work in censoring news about the environment. Not, of course, that you will hear any of the criticism of him on the Beeb, which is protecting its own fiercely.
The Guardian is not my natural stamping ground, but I was surprised to be rather impressed by the recent speech given by its Editor in Chief Alan Rusbridger about the importance of Twitter as an important disseminator of news these days. The same must be said, of course, for the huge number of blogs all around the world these days: I turn to them for news at least as often as I turn to the mainstream media since they tend to be faster, more complete and more diverse in allowing all viewpoints to be aired. And in the blogs, Richard Black gets a very bad press indeed, from all around the world.
You might agree with his staunchly warmist views, or you might not. But to have someone who attracts such contempt cannot be good for the BBC, or indeed for the UK. Surely it would be better to have someone with a more balanced viewpoint in this role, and to shift Richard Black sideways to something a little less loaded, like basket weaving, or retail news, or Welsh affairs, or something. Continue reading










