I have been reading the judgment of the European Court of human rights in Verein Klimaseniorinnen Schweiz and Others v Switzerland. It is grim reading. You might be shocked by it – unless of course you already know just how incompetent and dangerous that Court is.
The background may be briefly stated. In 2021 the Swiss government adopted some proposed legislation to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, but that proposal was rejected by the Swiss people in a referendum. The first applicant in this case (whose name may roughly be translated as “Old Swiss Women Bothered by the Climate”) evidently did not like the way the referendum vote went, and brought this case to force the Swiss Government to override it. They lost at first instance, and then again in the Federal Administrative Court, but have now won on the 3rd and final appeal to the Grand Chamber.
The decision is based on junk science, is bad in law and is even worse as a matter of politics. It will add a good deal of fuel to the fire of those who think the UK should leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) pretty sharpish, ideally before its court (the ECtHR) purports to prevent the UK from dealing effectively with its illegal immigration problem.
As to the science, the judgment collects together the most alarmist pronouncements from all the doomsayers that they could find, particularly from the IPCC, and uncritically treated it all as established fact, saying:
Continue reading


