I always hated Latin when I was a small child at school. I had a second-hand copy of Kennedy’s Latin Primer (I think that’s what it was called) where someone had changed “LATIN” into “EATING” on the front cover and written on the fly page:
Latin is a language
as dead as dead could be
it killed the ancient Romans
and now it’s killing me
I thought that was about right. Not only did I have to translate in and out of the bloody stuff, but I also had to do the scansion on Latin verse, including the names of all the feet. Viz in particular:
- dactyl: ⁻ ᵕ ᵕ (example: nausea)
- spondee: ⁻ ⁻ (example: Oh Lord!)
- iamb: ᵕ ⁻ (example: despair)
- trochee: ⁻ ᵕ (example: boredom)
- choriamb: ⁻ ᵕ ᵕ ⁻ (example: When will this end?)
When I took my scholarship examinations aged 12, I scored 14% in Latin I and 7% in Latin II. Unsurprisingly, Eastbourne College did not give me a scholarship, but instead pushed me up a year on my arrival, and conferred on me an exception whereby I would never have to study Latin again. Together with one or two others, I went through my public school career amid people a year older than me. That was a mixed blessing. When I left school, happily with a bunch of A grades, which were rare in those days, Cambridge was unavailable, because I was too young. I think perhaps Oxford might have taken me at my tender age, but for the fact that I had no Latin O-level. That seemed to me at the time, and seems to me now, utterly daft.
And so I went to Kent in Canterbury with a view of reading theoretic physics. After a year, however, I was allowed to transfer, with the generosity of the lovely Professor Molly Mahood, to the faculty of humanities where I obtained my degree in Continue reading →